Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi 140.Sayı

390 “Alternatif” Bir Uyuşmazlık Çözüm Yolu (Arabuluculuk) Aracılığıyla “Alternatif” İş Hukukuna Doğru Mahkemeleri Kanunu Tasarısı Taslağının Değerlendirilmesi (14 Mayıs 2016), Ankara: TİSK Yayını. Hodges, Ann C. (2004), “Mediation and the Transformation of American Labor Uni- ons”, 69 Missouri Law Review , Issue 2. http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/ vol69/iss2/2. Hoffman, Sharona (1996), “Mandatory Arbitration: Alternative Dispute Resolution or Coercive Dispute Suppression”, 17 Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law , No. 1. http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/bjell/vol17/iss1/4 Halegua, Aaron (2016), “United States”, Resolving individual labour disputes: A com- parative overview (Minawa Ebisui/Sean Cooney/Colin Fenwick (eds.)), Geneva: International Labour Office. HİADB (Hukuk İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Arabuluculuk Daire Başkanlığı), (ty) MoJ Presentation_Turkey_Mediation_TR. http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/source/MoJ%20Presentation_Turkey_ Mediation_TR.ppt Karademir, Derya (2016), “Panel”, İş Hukuku ve Sosyal Güvenlik Hukuku Derneği 40. Yıl Uluslararası Toplantısı İş Mahkemeleri Kanunu Tasarısı Taslağının Değer- lendirilmesi (14 Mayıs 2016), Ankara: TİSK Yayını. Kulms, R. (2012), “Privatising Civil Justice and the Day in Court”, Mediation Prin- ciples and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (K. J. Hopt/F. Steffek (eds.)), Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.academia.edu/7346978/Mediation_Principles_and_Regulation_in_ Comparative_Perspective Kokott (2009), Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 23 April 2009 (Case C97/08 P Akzo Nobel NV and Others v Commission of the European Communi- ties), European Court Reports 2009 I-08237. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-con- tent/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62008CC0097 Lipsky, David B./Ronald L. Seeber (2000), “Resolving workplace disputes in the Uni- ted States: The growth of alternative dispute resolution in employment relati- ons”, Journal of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Employment , 2(3). https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1801&context=ar ticles Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, (1997), “When Dispute Resolution Begets Disputes of its Own: Conflicts Among Dispute Professionals”, UCLA Law Review , Vol. 46, No. 6 https://ssrn.com/abstract =139667 Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2002), “When litigation is not the only way: Consensus buil- ding and mediation as public interest lawyering”, 10 Washington University Jour- nal of Law & Policy . https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi ?article=1176&context=facpub Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2006), “Peace and justice: Notes on the evolution and pur- poses of legal processes”, Georgetown Law Journal , 94(2). https://scholarship.law . georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=fac_lectures Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2007), “Restorative justice: What is it and does it work?”, An- nual Review of Law and Social Science, Vol.3. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev. lawsocsci.2.081805.110005. Menkel-Meadow, Carrie (2009), “Empirical studies of ADR: The Baseline problem of what ADR is and what it is compared to”.