106 Ceza Muhakemesinde Temyiz Kanun Yolu ve Getirdiği Tartışmalar Abstract: With the entry into force of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law No. 5271 concerning regional courts and the Court of Cassation, there has been an increase in the discussions and decisions regarding the qualifications and characteristics of the appeal remedy. While the studies on regional courts increased significantly, the subject of the Court of Cassation has not yet received the necessary attention even though there have been significant changes in the cassation. In this context, this study was prepared with the belief that a holistic examination of the cassation should be made together with the current case law. In this study, firstly, the subject of the cassation was evaluated within the scope of exceptional application procedures and the unappealable sentences. In that respect, the amount of the penalty - except the crimes concerning freedom of expression - and the change in the nature of the offense was evaluated. Secondly, the period for appeal is discussed together with its procedure, the limits of the review by the regional court, and its effects. Subsequently, the characteristics of the notification of the Office of the Chief Public Prosecutor of the Court of Cassation and the qualifications of the decisions which have been given with a hearing for some of the defendants and without a hearing for the others are discussed. In the last part of the study; the information on the types of decisions of the Court of Cassation, the effects of the reversal decision, the statute of repose during the cassation and the participation in the proceedings after the reversal decision are indicated. Keywords: Cassation, Court of Cassation, Appeal, Legal Remedy, Criminal Procedure Law 1. Temyiz Kanun Yoluyla İlgili Genel Açıklamalar 5271 sayılı Ceza Muhakemesi Kanunu’nun (CMK) Altıncı Kitabının, olağan kanun yollarını düzenleyen ikinci kısmının, üçüncü bölümünde temyiz kanun yolu yer almaktadır. CMK’nın sistematiğine göre temyiz, bölge adliye mahkemesinin bozma dışındaki hükümleri1 için Yargıtay tarafından hukuka aykırılık denetiminin yapıldığı kanun yolu aşamasıdır. CMK 01.06.2005 tarihinde yürürlüğe girse de istinafın yeni bir kanun yolu olarak kabul edilmesi nedeniyle bölge adliye mahkemelerinin kurulması ve faaliyete geçmesi zaman gerektiren süreçti. Bu 1 Öğretide “son karar” olarak adlandıranlar da bulunmaktadır. Bkz. Bahri Öztürk/ Durmuş Tezcan/Mustafa Ruhan Erdem/Özge Sırma Gezer/Yasemin F. Saygılar Kırıt/Esra Alan Akcan/Özdem Özaydın/Efser Erden Tütüncü/Derya Altınok Villemin/Mehmet Can Tok, Nazari ve Uygulamalı Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, Ankara, Seçkin, 2020, s. 745; Nevzat Toroslu/Metin Feyzioğlu, Ceza Muhakemesi Hukuku, Ankara, Savaş, 2019, s. 419.; Ali Rıza Çınar, Ceza Yargılamasında Temyiz Yolu, Ankara, Turhan, 2006, s. 74.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3OTE1