222 AnDyDsDO øONeOer ,úÕ÷ÕnGD <DSDy =eNk TeNnRORMiOeri AYuNDWOÕN BD÷ODPÕnGD Bir De÷erOenGirPe Anahtar Kelimeler: Yapay Zekâ, Adil Yargılanma Hakkı, Avukatlık, Meslek Etiği, Ayrımcılık Yasağı Abstract: Ross, one of the first robot lawyers, has made the transformation in law and the legal profession even more controversial with artificial intelligence technologies. Discussions are mostly carried out within the framework of legal ethics, the right to defence, the principle of fairness, right to a fair trial, and the prohibition of discrimination. While answering the question of whether it is possible for artificial intelligence technologies to serve an objective, transparent and prejudice-free trial in the legal world, pluralist democratic constitutional principles should be the basis of the benefit/harm calculation made. These principles, which guide the use of these technologies, make it necessary to examine the impact of artificial intelligence on the professional ethics of lawyers, prohibition of discrimination, the right to a fair trial and therefore on the rule of law. Artificial intelligence lawyers are functional and reduce the time required for human power. However, it is hardly possible to foresee whether these technologies will benefit the legal system in which justice is realized as fairness. To realize this benefit, the risks posed by technology and algorithms in the use of artificial intelligence lawyers should be minimized through an interdisciplinary study. Only in this way it will be possible to achieve a fair balance between fundamental rights and freedoms and democratic constitutional principles, with the positive effect of technological developments on the legal system. In this context, supranational regulations, guidelines and expert reports and opinions on the use of artificial intelligence technologies in legal system are particularly helpful. Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Right to a Fair Trial, Lawyers, Legal Ethics, the Prohibition of Discrimination GİRİŞ Yapay zekâ teknolojileri ve hukuk, son yılların en güncel ve popüler konuları arasında öne çıkmaktadır. Konuya ilişkin gittikçe derinleşen tartışmalar ve buna paralel şekilde zenginleşen bir literatür söz konusudur. İlgili tartışmalar yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin hukuki statüsüne,1 hukuki2 veya cezai sorumluluğa,3 yapay zekâ ve fikri mül1 Konuya ilişkin bir çalışma için bkz. Zafer Zeytin/Eray Gençay, “Hukuk ve Yapay Zekâ: E-Kişi, Mali Sorumluluk ve Bir Hukuk Uygulaması”, Türk Alman Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, C. 1, S. 1, 2019, s. 39-70. 2 Konuya ilişkin bir çalışma için bkz. Selin Çetin, “Yapay Zekâ ve Hukuk ile İlgili Güncel Tartışmalar, Yapay Zekâ Çağında Hukuk”, İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir Baroları Çalıştay Raporu, 2019, s. 52-63 (https://www.istanbulbarosu.org.tr/HaberDetay.aspx?ID=15324, e.t. 30.8.2021). 3 Konuya ilişkin bir çalışma için bkz. Gülşah Deniz Atalar, “Cezai Sorumluluk, Yapay Zekâ Çağında Hukuk”, İstanbul, Ankara ve İzmir Baroları Çalıştay Raporu, 2019, s. 64-73. (https://www.istanbulbarosu.org.tr/HaberDetay.aspx?ID=15324, e.t. 30.8.2021).
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3OTE1