541 TBB Dergisi 2023 (169) Berkant AKKUŞ tır.172 Hakkaniyete uygun bir sonuca ulaşmak için, yöntem belirli bir durumda temel kritere etki edebildiği sürece, eşit uzaklık yöntemi de dahil olmak üzere çeşitli yöntemler kullanılabilir. Kaynakça Kitaplar Akkutay Ali İbrahim, 200 Deniz Milinin Ötesindeki Kıta Sahanlığı, Adalet Yayınları, Ankara 2018. Aksar Yusuf, Teoride ve Uygulamada Uluslararası Hukuk-II, Seçkin Yayınları, İstanbul 2021. Charney Jonathan/Alexander Lewis, International Maritime Boundaries, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden 1993. Elferink Alex/Henriksen Tore/Busch Signe, Maritime Boundary Delimitation: The Case Law: Is It Consistent and Predictable?, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2018. Evans Malcolm, “Maritime Boundary Delimitation: Whatever Next?” içinde Jill Barrett/Richard Barnes, Editörler Law of the Sea: UNCLOS as a Living Treaty, British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London 2016. Gökalp İbrahim, Milletlerarası Adalet Divanı’nın Deniz Alanlarının Sınırlandırılmasına Dair Kararlarında Dikkate Aldığı İlkeler, Beta Basım A.Ş., İstanbul 2008. Jensen Oystein, The Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf Law and Legitimacy, Brill, The Hague 2014. Liao Xuexia, The Continental Shelf Delimitation Beyond 200 Nautical Miles Towards A Common Approach to Maritime Boundary-Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2021. Magnusson Bjarni, The Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles: Delineation, Delimitation and Dispute Settlement, Brill, The Hague 2015. Makaleler Anderson David, “Bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Bangladesh v. India”, The American Journal of International Law, New York 2015, C. 106, S. 4, s. 817-824. Baumert Kevin, “Article 76 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea: Parties and Non-Parties”, International Law Studies, Newport 2022, C. 99, S. 1, s. 964-988. Bernard Leonardo, “The Problem with the Concept of Single Continental Shelf”, AsiaPacific Journal of Ocean Law and Policy, The Hague 2022, C. 7, S. 1, s. 91-109. Churchill Robin, “The Bangladesh/Myanmar Case: Continuity and Novelty in the Law of Maritime Boundary Delimitation”, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, Cambridge 2012, C.1, S.1, s. 137-152. 172 Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras), Judgment, I.C.J. Reports 2007, para. 287.
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTQ3OTE1