data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71b66/71b66b5a74c97a1057b9f1bfbde4734ae85908f2" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92188/921882ad50cc39ac6bb291d719396e9006c15268" alt="Page Background"
UMUMA AÇIK MAHALLERDE ESER, İCRA,
FONOGRAM, YAPIM VE YAYINLARIN
KULLANILMASINA VE/VEYA İLETİLMESİNE
İLİŞKİN HÜKÜMLER ÇERÇEVESİNDE MESLEK
BİRLİKLERİNİN DURUMU (FSEK M. 41)
STATUS OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH INTELLECTUAL AN ARTISTIC WORKS CODE (Art. 41)
Mustafa ŞAHİN*
Özet:
Bu çalışmada, meslek birliklerine ilişkin FSEK, 41. mad-
desinde düzenlenen eser sahiplerinin talep hakları incelenmiştir.
Eser sahiplerinin anayasal güvence altında bulunan “hak arama
hürriyetleri”nin bir kanun hükmü ile sınırlandırılmasının imkansız
olacağı kabul edilmiş ve hak sahiplerinin, meslek birliklerine bağlı
kalmaksızın da haklarını talep edebilecekleri kabul edilmiştir.
Anahtar Sözcükler:
“Fikir ve Sanat Eserleri Hukuku”, “Hak Sa-
hibinin Talep Hakları”, “Anayasa Mahkemesi”, “Meslek Birlikleri”,
“Hak Arama Hürriyeti”.
Abstract:
In this study, the demand rights of owner as laid
down in Article 41 of the Law No. 5846 on Intellectual and Artistic
Works, which is related to professional unions, is analyzed. It is ac-
cepted that it would be impossible to restrict by a law the freedom
to claim rights of owner of artistic or intellectual works guraanteed
by the Constitution. Thus, it is recognized that the owner of an ar-
tictis or intellectual work can claim rights without applying to the
professional unions. Article 41 of the Law no. 5846 was declared un-
constitutional by the Constitutional Court.
Keywords
: “Intellectual and Artistic Works Law”, “Request
of Author’s Right”, “Constitutional Court”, “Professional Associati-
ons”, “Right to Legal Remedies”
1
*
Yrd. Doç. Dr.