data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/29b26/29b2655425ea785d8821e6843f0211feb1196f5a" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a5b2/4a5b20ee72a97cd95a31a5038a50f6b13eb2842d" alt="Page Background"
Uluslararası Çocuk Kaçırmanın Hukuki Yönlerine Dair Lahey Sözleşmesi: ...
516
Vivatvaraphol T., Back to Basics: Determining a Child’s Habitual Residence in Inter-
national Child Abduction Cases under the Hague Convention, 77 Fordham L.
Rev. 3325.
Weinkaufff Sarah, Uluslararası Velayet Anlaşmazlıklarında Merkezi Makamın Rölü
ve Görevleri- Almanya’nın Tecrübesi, Özel Hukuk Alanında Adli İşbirliği Çalış-
tayı, Ankara 2013, s.48-54.
Whitman C. B., Croll v. Croll: The Second Circuit Limits Custody Rights under the
Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, (2001),
9 Tul. J. Int’l & Comp. L. 605.
Wolfe K., A Tale of Two States: Successes and Failures of the 1980 Hague Convention
on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction in the United States and
Germany, 33 N.Y.U. J. Int’l L. & Pol. 285.
Weiner M. H., International Child Abduction and the Escape fromDomestic Violence,
(2000-2001), 69 Fordham L. Rev. 593.
Zawadzki D. M., The Role of Courts in Preventing International Child Abduction,
(2005), 13 Cardozo J. Int’l & Comp. L. 353.
http://hudoc.echr.coe.int.(e.t. 7.7.2014).
http://www.uhdigm.adalet.gov.tr. (e.t. 7.7.2014).
http://www.hcch.net/upload/expl28.(e.t. 7.7.2014).