data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c413/6c413f4f958470bfe4dbd2af9e7d362f988a3e31" alt="Show Menu"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cacb/8cacb5fb341da72b0be185effe6a81f56b6db24d" alt="Page Background"
348
6701 Sayılı Türkiye İnsan Hakları ve Eşitlik Kurumu Kanunu Sonrasında Bireysel ...
the organizational structure and operating bases of the Turkey Hu-
man Rights and Equality Institution, but also introduces a number
of regulations in respect of the principle of non-discrimination and
equality. This law aims to fulfil the obligations of Turkey with regard
to international law, to prevent unequal treatment and discrimina-
tion, and to establish a Human Rights Institution that will comply
with the Paris Principles specified by the United Nations General As-
sembly. The
ratione materiae
of Law No. 6701 has been widely con-
sidered when the international conventions that Turkey is a party to
are conceived.
The current Article 14 of the old Labor Law regulates the provi-
sions of severance pay. In accordance with the relevant provisions,
only those who are eligible to receive severance indemnity are emp-
loyees who are subject to the Labor Law. Those who are employed
under a service contract subject to the Law of Obligations, and tho-
se who are employed for a limited period of time with limited emp-
loyment contracts are not eligible to receive severance pay. In addi-
tion to this, according to the provision regulating the severance pay,
terminating the employment contract for one’s own desire within
one year from the marriage date of the woman entitles the severan-
ce pay. The aim of our work is to question whether these different
treatments are contrary to the equality principle of the Constitution
and Turkey’s international legal obligations or not.
Keywords
:
Severance Pay, TIHEK, Labor Law Content, Labor
Law Exceptions, Discrimination
I. GİRİŞ
6701 sayılı TİHEK Yasası’nın yürürlüğe girmesinden sonra, son-
raki kanun (
lex posterior)
olarak 6701 sayılı Yasa, getirmiş olduğu dü-
zenlemelerle aynı düzenlemeleri ihtiva eden önceki kanunları (
legi
priori)
ilga edecek mi meselesi bir sorun olarak kendini göstermekte-
dir.
1
22.5.2003 tarihli ve 4857 sayılı İş Kanunu’nun 120nci maddesiyle
25.8.1971 tarihli ve 1475 sayılı mülga İş Kanunu’nun kıdem tazminatını
düzenleyen 14. maddesi yürürlükte bırakılmıştır. Eski İş Kanunu’nun
yürürlükte olan 14. maddesine göre kıdem tazminatına hak kazanabil-
mek için ilk şart olarak İş Kanunu’na göre istihdam edilen bir işçi ol-
mak gerekecektir. Bu anlamda İş Kanunu’na göre istihdam edilmeyen,
Borçlar Kanunu hükümlerince hizmet akdiyle çalışan birisinin hizmet
1
Kemal Gözler, ‘‘Yorum İlkeleri’’, Kamu Hukukçuları Platformu Toplantısı, An-
kara, 29.9.2012, s.66