TBB Dergisi 98. Sayı

301 / 529

Kent Planlama ve Adalet İlişkisinin Değişen İçeriği 300
Ersoy, Melih, Bilirkişilik Kurumu ve Etik Sorunlar, 8.Kasım Dünya Şehir�
cilik Günü 31. Kolokyumu, Planlama Meslek Alanı: Geçmişten Geleceğe,
Bildiriler Kitabı, TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası yayını, Ankara, 2008
Forester, John. Planning in the Face of Power, Berkeley, California: Univer-
sity of California Press,1989
Gans, Herbert, J., Planning for People, not Buildings, Environment and
Planning A, Vol:1, p:33-46, 1969
Harvey,David, Social Justice and the City, London, 1973
Harvey, David, Justice Nature and the Geography of Difference, Blackwell,
Oxford, 1996
Harloe, Micheal, Social Justice and the City: The New ‘Liberal Formula-
tion’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Volume 25,
p:889-897, 2001
Healey,Patsy, Collaborative Planning, Shaping Places in Fragmented
Societies,UBC Press, Canada, 1997
Keleş, Ruşen, Kentleşme Politikası, İmge yayınları, Ankara, 1990
Lefebvre, Henri, The Survival of Capitalism, London,1974
Forester, John, Planning in the Face of Power, University of California
Press, Berkeley, 1989
Fainstein, Susan,Competitiveness, Cohesion, and Governance: Their
Implications for Social Justice, International Journal of Urban and Regi�
onal Research Volume 25, p:884-888, 2001
Jacobs, Jane, (1961) The Life and Death of Great American Cities, Random
House, New York
Parnel, Susan, Pieterse,Edgar, The ‘Right to the City’: Institutional Impe-
ratives of a Developmental State, International Journal of Urban and
Regional Research, Volume 34, s:146–62, 2010
Perera, Gihan, Claiming the Right to the City,
Sayer, Andrew. and Storper,Micheal, Ethics unbound: for a normative
turn in social theory.
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15.1, 1–18, 1997
Şengül, Tarık,’Planlama Paradigmalarının Dönüşümü Üzerine Eleştirel
Bir Değerlendirme’, Kentsel Planlama Kuramları. M.Ersoy (ed.), İmge
Kitabevi, Ankara, s:59-114, 2007