373 / 413
İngiliz Mahkemelerince Şirket Tüzel Kişiliği Perdesinin Kaldırılması
372
KAYNAKLAR
Bainbridge S.M.: “Abolishing Veil Piercing” J.Corp.L. 2001, Vol. 26, s. 479 vd.
Barber D.H.: “Piercing the Corporate Veil” Willamatte L. Rev. 1980-1981, Vol. 17, s. 371
vd.
Blake B.: “Piercing the Corporate Veil” OHIO N.U.L. 2010, Vol. 36, s. 1191 vd.
Comer B.: “Piercing the Corporate Veil in Wilson v. Friedberg” C.L.Rev. 1996-1997,
Vol. 48, s. 905 vd.
Davies P.L.: Principles of Modern Company Law, 8th edn, London 2008.
Dignam A. / Lowry, J.: Company Law, 4th edn, London 2012.
Fullbrook J.: “Case Comment Chandler v Cape plc: personel injury: liability: negli-
gence” JPI Law 2012, Vol. 3, s. 135 vd.
Hannigan B.: Company Law, 3rd edn, London 2012.
Gelb H.: “Limited Liability Policy and Veil Piercing” Wyo L. Rev. 2009, Vol. 9, s. 551
vd.
Mitchell G.: “Piercing the Corporate Veil to Impose Contractual Liability on a Direc-
tor” B.J.IB&F.L. Vol. 27, s. 149 vd.
Mohanty S. / Bahandari V.: “The evolution of separate legal personality doctrine and
its exceptions: a comparative analysis” Comp. Law. 2011 Vol. 194-205
Ridley A.: Key Facts Company Law, 4th edn, London 2011.
Ring G.: “Piercing the Corporate Veil: J.L. Brock Builders, Inc. V. Dahlbeck” C. L.Rev.
1987-1988, Vol. 21, s. 621 vd.
Shepherd C.: Company Law, 2 nd edn, London 2012.
Shub O.: “Separate Corporate Personality: Piercing the Veil” FDCC Quarterly 2006,
Vol. 56, s. 253 vd.
Smith D.G.: Piercing the Corporate Veil in Regulated Industries, B.Y.U.L. Rev. 2008,
Vol. 4, s. 1165 vd.
Vlasov D.: “Liability of Puppeteer for a Puppet: a Recent Development in Law on
Piercing the Corporate Veil” Comp. Law, Vol. 33, s. 356 vd.