135 / 533
Hükmün Açıklanmasının Geri Bırakılmasına İlişkin Güncel Sorunların Yargıtay Kararları ...
134
Abstract:
The concept of stay of execution was adopted
in Turkey for the first time in respect to the children led to crime
through the 23rd article of the Child Protection Act N. 5395, entered
into force on 15/07/2005 and has been significantly established
in our legal system since then in line with the legal amendments
enacted and jurisdiction of High Court Of Appeals. However, it is
seen that a number of issues related to this institution are still in
question while certain issues originate from different practices of
the High Court of Appeals. The regulation in the 8th paragraph of
the Article 231 of the Procedural Penal Law must be interpreted
as that the prescription period ceases between the date of the
finalization of the decision of staying the judgment and the date
of the commissioning of the offence within the probation period
provided that the decision is finalized thereafter. According to the
11st paragraph of the Article 231 of the PPL, in the events that the
accused perpetrates an intentional offence or intentionally violates
the obligations relating to the probation measures, it is not possible
to make any amendment to the judgment to be declared. While the
jurisdiction of the High Court of Appeals Docket Nr. 2012/10-534. –
Decree Nr. 2013/15 which enables a more comprehensive review
in the case of an appeal of the stay of judgment entails negative
outcomes in respect to the procedural penal practice, it draws
attention as a positive development as it prevents an act to be
assessed within the scope of the stay of judgment as a result of an
incorrect legal qualification and enables the establishment the right
to trial in reasonable time. The legal regulation to be made in the
aim of subjecting the institution to the review of court of appeal will
ensure the resolution of the problems.
Keywords:
Stay of judgment, interruption of prescription, pro-
bation period, obligation, objection.
GİRİŞ
Hükmün açıklanmasının geri bırakılması, 15/07/2005 tarihin-
de yürürlüğe giren 5395 sayılı Çocuk Koruma Kanunu’nun 23’üncü
maddesi ile ilk olarak suça sürüklenen çocuklar bakımından hukuk
yaşamımıza girmiş, 19/12/2006 tarihinde yürürlüğe giren 5560 sa-
yılı Kanun’un 23’üncü maddesiyle 5271 sayılı Ceza Muhakemesi
Kanunu’nun 231. maddesinde yapılan değişiklik sonucu on sekiz ya-
şını doldurmuş olan kişiler hakkında da uygulanır hale gelmiştir. 5560
sayılı Kanun’un 40’ıncı maddesiyle ÇKK’nın 23’üncü maddesi değişti-
rilerek, hükmün açıklanmasının geri bırakılması bakımından, denetim
süresindeki farklılık dışında, suça sürüklenen çocuklar ile yaşı büyük
sanıklar arasında herhangi bir fark kalmamıştır.